Page 1 of 1

The ole' shell game

PostPosted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:38 am
by tbirds
Step right up. See if you can identify the 2 weeks below in which BStokley got the start for the T-Birds:

1. Week 8: 30 yards receiving
2. Week 9: 30 yards receiving
3. Week 10: 130 yards receiving, 2 TDs

PostPosted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 1:57 pm
by hammers
What's your point? Stokely has only 3 games in which he's scored double-digit points. Those are the same three games in which he caught TD's.

Let's see, that's 3 productive games over a span of 9 games. That breaks down to one good game for every three he plays.

Start him the next three weeks and you should catch one of his productive games. You're only mistake was not playing him the 3rd game.

Of course, you'll have to live with his 5pts/game average during those other two starts, but hey, that's what you get when you rely on the 4th option for an offense.

What was the name of the previous 3rd WR option on Indy you coveted so many years ago? I can't recall his name but I remember he amounted to NOTHING despite your convictions that he was an outstanding WR.

Stokely's a good 3rd option, but without M.Harrison, E.James and R.Wayne drawing coverages, he'd be outmatched by defenses
#1 and #2 DB's. He's not someone I consider worth relying on now or for the future. He's a bye week fill in at best.

Of course, I encourage you to languish on with your delusions of Stokely grandeur. I find it immensely entertaining.

J

PostPosted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 2:27 pm
by tbirds
The point is that his scoring seems to vary perfectly with whether I started him or not. The other point is that you're an asswad.

and, I find your face immensely entertaining.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 2:27 pm
by tbirds
double post.

I might as well note in this double-post, that I saw a girl walking to work a couple weeks ago that was wearing red, high-heeled Chuck Taylors with otherwise normal business dress. It was a level of classiness that only you could appreciate, J.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:00 pm
by hammers
Chicks-in-Chucks are HOT! High-heeled? I'm not sure if I've ever seen a pair of those.

My point is you smell bad. You still won your game so what's it matter?

PostPosted: Tue Nov 16, 2004 8:52 am
by tbirds
They weren't stiletto high heels, just like those big giant block heels that chicks think are "cute" but they're not. They looked like they were made of red rubber. Probably a custom job I'd imagine.

I'm coming back this year and can't wait to pound you.